Dumblr of Age

In which we learn Transformers is actually about the Bible, and suddenly my childhood makes sense.

Here’s the whole goddamned horrible and amazing Easter thing we got in the mail all in one post.  I think World Harvest Church does this just to force Jesus Christ back from the sky early to topple their tables.  It must be a huge temptation for Him.

But He won’t, because He doesn’t want to get Resurrection Seed all over His face.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

One last thought — I just now got the double meaning of “the ultimate giveaway.” At least I hope that’s supposed to be a(n extremely tacky) double meaning.  It is distinctly possible nobody at that church realizes what Easter celebrates.  Hrm.  Upon further reflection, I’m not sure what possibility is worse.

Birth Control 101 For Idiots

bemusedlybespectacled:

This is hormonal birth control.

As you can see on the box, you take exactly one pill per day. To make sure it works, you need to take one pill every day at the same time, or it stops working. You take only one pill, and you keep taking them regardless of what you are doing that day.

Hormonal birth control can be used to treat a lot of different diseases, like anemia caused by excessive menstruation. It is a prescription medication that can cost around $15-50 a month. Because it is a prescription medication, it should be covered by insurance, as it treats legitimate health problems.

This is Viagra.

It, too, can treat legitimate health problems like altitude sickness and pulmonary hypertension, but it is usually prescribed for erectile dysfunction. Unlike the Pill, Viagra is taken every time you want to have sex. A lot of health insurance companies cover Viagra, so it costs about as much as your co-pay.

This is a condom.

It is not a prescription medication, and has no health benefits (besides the prevention of STIs and pregnancy). Like Viagra, you must use one before you have sex: indeed, before each sex act. They cost about a dollar per condom.

This is Sandra Fluke.

She testified before a small, Democrat-led hearing after she was cut out of the actual birth control/insurance discussion. Her testimony was about a friend of hers who, because her insurance did not cover birth control, lost an ovary due to an ovarian cyst.

This somehow translates into “I, myself, personally, am having so much sex I can’t afford birth control, and so I want the government to pay for it.”

This is wrong for multiple reasons.

  1. It was about a friend, not her. To say her testimony was about her personally is factually incorrect.
  2. Sex had nothing to do with the testimony - her friend lost an ovary because of medical condition that was left untreated. A medical condition that was completely treatable, but wasn’t, because her insurance wouldn’t cover it. To say that her testimony was about her being “a slut” or “a prostitute” is factually incorrect.
  3. Even if she was having loads of sex, she would still only have one pill a day, not one pill per sex act, so to say “I’m having so much sex I can’t afford birth control” is completely erroneous. The Pill is not Viagra or condoms. To say that she is such “a slut” that she constantly needs more pills is factually incorrect.
  4. The current political debate is not “should the government pay for birth control?” The debate is “should insurance companies, that people and their employers pay for, on their own, be required to cover birth control?” To say that Sandra Fluke wants the government to pay for her birth control is factually incorrect.
  5. Religious organizations do not want to have birth control covered by their insurance, even for employees not of their faith, even if their employees never actually use their insurance to cover birth control. By this logic, they should also not pay their employees, because they could use that money to pay for birth control out of pocket. To say that this issue is about religious freedom and not about women’s health is disingenuous, as Ms. Fluke’s testimony demonstrates.

Hopefully this makes things a little clearer.

rosalarian:

christiannightmares:

Women for Santorum: ‘A baby from rape is a gift from God’ (Found at Joe. My. God.)

Brilliant satire.

When life gives you rape, make rapeade.

comicsalliance:

Religious Anti-Ninja Turtle Propaganda from the Ancient World [Video]

By Andy Khouri

As it turns out, the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles are components of an evangelistic gospel of “outright Hinduism, occultism and humanism” that teaches children “ideals that are contrary to Christian beliefs” with subversive merchandise like “pepperoni sticks.” At least, that’s according to a group of curiously coiffed Canadian men in an early 1990s propaganda film decrying the original TMNT animated series, Vanilla IceBart Simpson and other alleged evils of the ancient world.

“It’s witchcraft, pure and simple,” says one man in the film, which also objects to children’s candy in the shape of instruments used to create “rock music.” The clip was compiled by Four Four from an unearthed “VHS tape” of a propaganda film called Not Just Fun And Games which warned primitive man of the infernal dangers of children’s cartoons and assorted merchandise. It is a fascinating glimpse into an unremembered time in our distant past when humanity was first confronted with new and seemingly terrifying concepts like martial arts, anthropomorphized reptiles, and rap music. 

They seem like cavemen to us but understand that these were good Canadian people, just frightened and unlearned, and they reacted without the benefit of the educational instruments we take for granted — things like YouTube, Wikipedia, and televisions with channels beyond the number 8.

When the dead man wearing a mullet and moustache said, “You heard it here first, folks, a Rat named Splinter is the hero of this cartoon,” he very likely believed that he was literally the first person to transmit that information to anyone in the world.

Read more.

siphersaysstuff:

rosalarian:

duessa:

bacon-beer-and-boobs:

ih8religion:

There is just no answer to this - I might as well shut down my blog right now, because I see with clarity now that god must really exist or mothers would have more hands!!
Thank you The Church of Christ.  Thank you.
;)
-TylerI H8 RELIGION 

After all, a woman’s only purpose is for the creation and care of the wee ones. Not only are we to bare the children, but we are to care for them while baring more. By this logic, we should have multiple hands in which to properly care for them. Evolution fails again.

Whaaaaaaat.

If God exists, how come he didn’t give women more than 2 hands?

The human body is easily the biggest argument AGAINST any form of “intelligent design”. We are a poorly-made pile of parts.

i whaaaaaaaaa

siphersaysstuff:

rosalarian:

duessa:

bacon-beer-and-boobs:

ih8religion:

There is just no answer to this - I might as well shut down my blog right now, because I see with clarity now that god must really exist or mothers would have more hands!!

Thank you The Church of Christ.  Thank you.

;)

-Tyler
I H8 RELIGION 

After all, a woman’s only purpose is for the creation and care of the wee ones. Not only are we to bare the children, but we are to care for them while baring more. By this logic, we should have multiple hands in which to properly care for them. Evolution fails again.

Whaaaaaaat.

If God exists, how come he didn’t give women more than 2 hands?

The human body is easily the biggest argument AGAINST any form of “intelligent design”. We are a poorly-made pile of parts.

i whaaaaaaaaa