This is totally babies

Here, let me put this to a vote.
This guy has sent this same First Post like 30 times.  I didn’t approve it the first time because, dude, there is not one true thing in there.  It is 100% bullshit, every last word.  But then he keeps on trying.  Is there merit to letting one through?  I mean, it’s not even a fun post to refute.  You just have to say “No, that’s a lie” after every sentence until you’re done.  Maybe with a single “how the hell are you using ‘intellectual’ as a slur” somewhere in there.  Possibly tie it all up with asking him to read an actual book or visit a museum.  
Really, releasing it on my comments just means he’s going to get laughed at a whole bunch.  I’m not sure if it’s worth it, but I can be convinced.  Maybe I need a different perspective, is all.

Here, let me put this to a vote.

This guy has sent this same First Post like 30 times.  I didn’t approve it the first time because, dude, there is not one true thing in there.  It is 100% bullshit, every last word.  But then he keeps on trying.  Is there merit to letting one through?  I mean, it’s not even a fun post to refute.  You just have to say “No, that’s a lie” after every sentence until you’re done.  Maybe with a single “how the hell are you using ‘intellectual’ as a slur” somewhere in there.  Possibly tie it all up with asking him to read an actual book or visit a museum.  

Really, releasing it on my comments just means he’s going to get laughed at a whole bunch.  I’m not sure if it’s worth it, but I can be convinced.  Maybe I need a different perspective, is all.

  1. solarmoonpowerlanding reblogged this from jephjacques
  2. thecommander236 reblogged this from itswalky
  3. richeffinrank reblogged this from jephjacques and added:
    Is this real life? yikes…
  4. dtunkatunks reblogged this from jephjacques and added:
    good guy jeph jacques lookin out for the uneducated online
  5. mistersaxon reblogged this from jephjacques and added:
    Be fair - he might actually be “no fan of ultimately pointless comments arguing” (although he sure isn’t acting that...
  6. aziraphalesshop reblogged this from jephjacques
  7. mrnexx said: The thing is, people laughing at his ignorance will be taken as validation of his sense of being a persecuted minority. I say to him “No, sir, fuckheads are not the minority and you, sir, are a fuckhead.”
  8. effulgentinara said: It seems strangely worded - almost like some kind of creationist spam-bot.
  9. whenwherehau said: Well, if someone reading the comic shares Joyce’s beliefs then I think it’d be interesting to let that discussion happen. Part of me may want this for entertainment reasons though…
  10. darkstormytrite reblogged this from itswalky and added:
    I’ll just leave these here: BOOKS the Triumph of an Idea Greatest Show on Earth: the Evidence for Evolution The Making...
  11. ikagun reblogged this from seanmonster
  12. seanmonster reblogged this from itswalky and added:
    Had to do it.
  13. chwineka said: I say no, just because it’s unnerving how he kept trying to post the same comment over and over again…
  14. paladin-of-the-dank reblogged this from itswalky and added:
    How… How stupid does a guy have to be to not recognize the difference between macroevolution and microevolution?
  15. stormrunner1981 reblogged this from itswalky and added:
    don’t even…No don’t approve that if they...that desperate for approval for
  16. gastrophobia said: "There are no new species" is something someone who’s never heard of dog breeds say.
  17. waldonbest reblogged this from jephjacques
  18. batneko reblogged this from itswalky and added:
    No, please don’t. He’ll think it’s approval.
  19. wannafight reblogged this from jephjacques and added:
    Maybe send him a few documented microbiology growth cultures. Let him see how wrong he is. Then continue to ignore the...
  20. skarmoth reblogged this from jephjacques